Abstract

Inventory managers are responsible for the trade-off between inventory holding costs and customer service. In this paper we consider a periodic review multi-item inventory system with exogenous lot-sizes and backordering. The objective is to minimize the total inventory holding costs subject to the constraint that the aggregate fill rate should be at least equal to a target level. The aggregate fill rate is a weighted average of the fill rates of all items in the assortment. We consider three ways of defining this aggregate fill rate: using generic weights, weights based on the average demand (volume) or weights based on the average (monetary) turnover. We show that the definition of the aggregate service can have huge effects on the performance of the system. So, inventory managers should be very careful on which definition to apply. We also derive four heuristics to determine the reorder levels for all items. One heuristic is very generic and can be applied to many problems including multi-item multi-echelon inventory systems and systems with a constrained aggregate ready rate. Since multiple assumptions made to derive the heuristics are common assumptions made in the literature, we first test the accuracy of these approximations using simulation. Next, we evaluate the heuristics based on data from a large international reseller. The heuristic based on the most accurate approximation performs best, is close to optimal and very efficient. Savings compared to no service level differentiation are large (up to 28.7%) and depend on the definition of the aggregate service.

Highlights

  • We consider three ways of defining this aggregate fill rate: using generic weights, weights based on the average demand or weights based on the average turnover

  • In practice many inventory managers are confronted with aggregate key performance indicators (KPI’s) imposed by senior management

  • In this paper we study the problem how to determine the reorder levels for individual stock keeping units (SKU’s) if the objective is to minimize the total inventory holding costs for a set of SKU’s subject to an aggregate fill rate constraint

Read more

Summary

Introduction

In practice many inventory managers are confronted with aggregate key performance indicators (KPI’s) imposed by senior management. In this paper we study the problem how to determine the reorder levels (the decision variables) for individual SKU’s if the objective is to minimize the total inventory holding costs (or the total investment in inventories) for a set of SKU’s subject to an aggregate fill rate constraint. Demand is modelled as a continuous stochastic variable To solve this multi-item problem, three main options exist. The third option is to solve the original multi-item problem and find the optimal fill rates (and related reorder levels) per individual SKU. In this paper we will develop and test four new heuristics using the third option to primarily solve the problem with an aggregate weighted fill rate constraint. The contribution of this paper is four-fold: First, multiple heuristics are developed for the multi-item service-level-constrained inventory problem with periodic review and exogenous lot-sizes.

Literature review
The four heuristics
Heuristic H1
Heuristic H2
Heuristic H3
Heuristic H4
An overview of the four heuristics
Finding the optimal reorder levels
Testing the assumptions
Findings
Empirical investigation
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.