Abstract
AbstractIn this paper we compare the static and dynamic application of heuristic and optimal solution methods to job‐shop scheduling problems when processing times are uncertain. Recently developed optimizing algorithms and several heuristics are used to evaluate 53 standard job‐shop scheduling problems with a makespan objective when job processing times are known with varying degrees of uncertainty. Results indicate that fixed optimal sequences derived from deterministic assumptions quickly deteriorate with the introduction of processing time uncertainty when compared with dynamically updated heuristic schedules. As processing time uncertainty grows, we demonstrate that simple dispatch heuristics provide performance comparable or superior to that of algorithmically more sophisticated scheduling policies.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.