Heterometallic Titanium-Organic Frameworks as Dual Metal Catalysts for Synergistic Non-Buffered Hydrolysis of Nerve Agent Simulants

Abstract

Heterometallic or mixed-metal Metal-Organic Frameworks (MOFs), incorporating two or more metal ions to the inorganic node of the frameworks, are increasingly gaining importance as a route to produce materials with increasing chemical and functional complexity. Heterometallic MOFs can offer important advantages over their homometallic counterparts to enable targeted modification of the adsorption properties, structural response, electronic structure or chemical reactivity of the framework. This field is still in its infancy likely due to the difficulties of controlling the formation of heterometallic nodes by direct synthesis. This restriction is even more acute in the case of titanium frameworks for which their challenging chemistry renders post-synthetic doping of preformed materials as the only route available. However, this often results in partial or non-homogeneous metal substitution in detriment of the potential benefits of controlling metal distribution at an atomic level toward performance improvement. We report the first family of heterometallic titanium frameworks that can be prepared by direct synthesis from metal precursors and trimesic acid. MUV-101 frameworks [TiM2(µ3-O)(O2CR)6X3] (M = Mg, Fe, Co, Ni; X = H2O, OH-, O2-) combine mesoporosity with good chemical stability. We use these materials to exemplify the advantages of controlling metal distribution across the framework in heterogeneous catalysis by exploring their activity toward the degradation of a nerve agent simulant of Sarin gas. MUV-101(Fe) is the only pristine MOF capable of catalytic degradation of (diisopropyl-fluorophosphate) DIFP in non-buffered aqueous media without the presence of a basic/nucleophilic co-catalyst. Compared to MUV-101(Fe), other titanium heterometallic and homometallic MOFs as MUV-101(Mg, Co and Ni), MUV-10(Mn), MIL-100(Ti and Fe) or UiO-66(Zr), all display a poorer performance or are poisoned by the degradation products. The catalytic activity of MUV-101(Fe) cannot be explained only by the association of Ti(IV) and Fe(III) but to their synergistic cooperation. Our simulations suggest that the combination of Ti(IV) Lewis acid and Fe(III)-OH Bronsted base sites in this dual metal catalyst leads to a much lower energy barrier for more efficient degradation of DIFP in absence of a base. Overall, this mechanism resembles the activity of the metalloenzyme purple acid phosphatase that displays also bimetallic active sites.