Abstract

In this paper, we study the incentives for international cooperation if (some) countries prefer a more equitable distribution of per capita emission levels. For countries that differ with respect to their population size, we analyze the impact of such an equity preference first for a bilateral, and then for a multilateral environmental problem. We show that - contrary to the two-country-case - for the latter there is no uniform percentage reduction of emissions that makes all countries better off. Rather, equity oriented countries (for example developing countries) enter a coalition only if they don't have to reduce as much. We demonstrate that a high degree of cooperation in international environmental negotiations can be explained if most countries are interested in equity and are not too different with respect to their per capita levels. If, however, countries differ too much in population size and per capita emissions, generally no coalition will be stable without restrictions on entry into or exit out of a coalition. We show that in such a situation equity-orientation does not improve upon the prospects for cooperation.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.