Abstract
BackgroundImmune-checkpoint inhibitors against programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1)/programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) have shown remarkable therapeutic activity in non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, biomarker-based patient selection remains a challenge. Our aim was to assess the heterogeneity of various immune markers between different tumor areas of surgically resected NSCLC specimens. Materials and MethodsWe included 94 adenocarcinoma (ADC) and 50 squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) specimens. Two distinct tumor areas of each tumor sample were selected and incorporated into tissue microarrays. PD-L1 expression in tumor cells (TCs) and immune cells (ICs) was assessed using clone SP142 (Ventana). PDL1 gene amplification was assessed using fluorescence in situ hybridization. CD3 and CD8 densities were quantified using digital image-based analysis. Heterogeneity was assessed using kappa agreement index (KI) and intraclass correlation coefficient. ResultsPrevalence of PD-L1 expression was 16.8% in TCs and 27.8% in ICs. Eleven tumors (7.6%) showed PDL1 amplification. In ADC, KI of PD-L1 TC and IC expression between cores was 0.465 and 0.260, compared with 0.274 and 0.124 in SCC, respectively. Higher concordance was observed for PDL1 amplification (KI, 0.647 in ADC and KI, 1 in SCC). Eleven (61.1%) of 18 amplified cores showed PD-L1 staining in < 5% of TCs. Intraclass correlation coefficients for CD3 and CD8 were 0.293 and 0.186 in ADC and 0.489 and 0.610 in SCC samples, respectively. ConclusionsWe found significant heterogeneity of PD-L1 expression in both ADC and SCC samples, especially in the IC compartment. Heterogeneous expression of PD-L1 could misclassify patients for PD-1/PD-L1-directed therapies.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.