Abstract
Point of care diagnostic tests (POCTs) for sexually transmitted infections (STIs) have the potential to improve STI care worldwide. However, barriers to adoption, cost considerations and practitioner priorities may not be uniform globally and over time. We conducted two surveys, 7years apart, among members of the International Union Against Sexually Transmitted Infections (IUSTI), and compare results here. Surveys were given to members attending two IUSTI conferences in 2012 (Australia) and 2019 (Estonia). Descriptive analyses were performed and chi-square or Fisher's exact tests conducted. Amongst N = 190 participants in 2012 and N = 166 in 2019, 61% in 2012 and 77% in 2019 were from high-income countries (HICs). In 2012, 84% of respondents from low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) and 70% from HICs thought cost of test was more important than amount of reimbursement. Trends were similar in 2019. In 2012, unreliability was considered the most important barrier to POCT use by all groups, followed by being laboratory-driven and complexity. In 2019, time frame was considered most important, followed by unreliability and being laboratory-driven. In 2012, the top priority for POCT development among LMIC respondents was early HIV seroconversion (31%), versus chlamydia (57%) for HICs. In 2019, chlamydia remained top priority for HICs (40%), followed by early HIV seroconversion (19%) and gonorrhea (17%); top priorities for LMICs were chlamydia (26%), HPV (24%), and early HIV seroconversion (21%). Practitioner priorities for STI POCTs may be shifting. Cost may be critical to adoption in all settings. Larger studies are needed to verify findings.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.