Abstract

Previous research suggests that high functioning (HF) children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) sometimes have problems learning categories, but often appear to perform normally in categorization tasks. The deficits that individuals with ASD show when learning categories have been attributed to executive dysfunction, general deficits in implicit learning, atypical cognitive strategies, or abnormal perceptual biases and abilities. Several of these psychological explanations for category learning deficits have been associated with neural abnormalities such as cortical underconnectivity. The present study evaluated how well existing neurally based theories account for atypical perceptual category learning shown by HF children with ASD across multiple category learning tasks involving novel, abstract shapes. Consistent with earlier results, children’s performances revealed two distinct patterns of learning and generalization associated with ASD: one was indistinguishable from performance in typically developing children; the other revealed dramatic impairments. These two patterns were evident regardless of training regimen or stimulus set. Surprisingly, some children with ASD showed both patterns. Simulations of perceptual category learning could account for the two observed patterns in terms of differences in neural plasticity. However, no current psychological or neural theory adequately explains why a child with ASD might show such large fluctuations in category learning ability across training conditions or stimulus sets.

Highlights

  • Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is characterized by deficits in communicative and social skills as well as repetitive actions/fixed interests (American Psychiatric Association, 2013)

  • Evaluations of A Type I/II Generalization Patterns First, in order to assess the generally applicability of the A Type I/II distinction to high functioning (HF) children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) in category learning tasks, we applied the pre-established criterion (Dovgopoly and Mercado, 2013; Church et al, 2015) for identifying children of each type to the new sample of children with ASD, and compared the generalization profiles associated with identified subgroups

  • Heterogeneity in the capacities and sensitivities of individuals with ASD is not specific to category learning and can be observed in social impairment (Waterhouse, 2013), as well as in physiological responses (e.g., Hirstein et al, 2001). Such heterogeneities in deficits within and across individuals with ASD are widely recognized by researchers, the possibility that comparable performance variations might be present within particular cognitive capacities does not appear to have been examined or discussed in past work

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is characterized by deficits in communicative and social skills as well as repetitive actions/fixed interests (American Psychiatric Association, 2013). Recent neural and behavioral evidence suggests, that less obvious dysfunctions in basic learning and perceptual-motor mechanisms may play a greater role in ASD than was previously assumed (Casanova et al, 2002; Rubenstein and Merzenich, 2003; Markram and Markram, 2010; LeBlanc and Fagiolini, 2011; Yizhar et al, 2011; Donnellan et al, 2012; Robledo et al, 2012; Torres et al, 2013) Such difficulties may degrade a child’s ability to learn basic categories and to generalize what they learn (Cohen, 1998; McClelland, 2000; Grossberg and Seidman, 2006; Dovgopoly and Mercado, 2013).

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call