Abstract
A semi-classical theory was re-derived in a consistent form for properly comparing direct and heterodyne detection as a function of wavelength. Plots are shown for example cases. We show that heterodyne should be better than direct detection for wavelengths longer than 3 microns, even with a bandwidth disadvantage, since direct detection is more sensitive to ambient temperature background than heterodyne detection. For interferometry the advantage of heterodyne is more pronounced in this case due to the smaller beam filling factors. When we include even the effect of surpassing the noise temperature quantum limit with a novel correlation receiver architecture (see paper 10701-94), the advantage of heterodyne detection becomes irrefutable.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
