Heterochromatin diversity in Cymbidium, and its relationship to differential DNA replication

Abstract

1. 1. DNA was extracted from aseptical cultures of protocorms of the orchid Cymbidium and analysed by thermal denaturation. The denaturation profiles revealed an AT-rich fraction of about 18% of total DNA. 2. 2. Mitotic chromosomes and diploid and endopolyploid nuclei of in vitro cultured protocorms and root tips were differentially stained with quinacrine (Q), 33258 Hoechst (H) and a novel compound 4′-6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) [10], as well as by the Giemsa C-banding technique. The centromeric regions display very bright fluorescence with all three fluorochromes and stain intensely following the Giemsa procedure. It is proposed that the AT-rich fraction of the Cymbidium DNA is located within the centromeric heterochromatin. 3. 3. In interphase nuclei differential Q, H, and DAPI fluorescence both within and between the chromocenters occurs. In nuclei with enlarged chromocenters, i.e. with amplified DNA in heterochromatin [2], the increased size of chromocenters is mainly caused by enlargement of the less brightly fluorescing fractions of the heterochromatin. The proportion of the very brightly fluorescing heterochromatin is similar in all nuclei (about 7%). 4. 4. A comparison of nucleolar size and differential Giemsa staining of the nucleolus organizers showed that there is no disproportional increase of nucleoli and nucleolus organizing heterochromatin during endopolyploidization. That means, there is no indication for amplification of ribosomal DNA. 5. 5. Electron micrographs particularly of heterochromatin-rich nuclei revealed areas of different chromatin density within and between the chromocenters. However, the differences in fiber packaging density are much smaller than the observed differences in fluorescence brightness. 6. 6. The data obtained are interpreted as evidence for differential replication of AT-rich and non-AT-rich heterochromatin. It is suggested that DNA amplification [2, 4] is restricted to a non-AT-rich component which apparently is located neither in the brightly fluorescent centromeric nor in the nucleolus-associated heterochromatin.