Abstract

After the publication of the story 'Jansen' by L.H. Wiener, someone referred to as L. instituted legal proceedings because of an insulting passage in this story. The court of Amsterdam found that readers probably considered this passage as referring to reality - and to L. in particular - and therefore decided to ban the story. With the help of the so-called criterion of uniqueness, the present article shows how fictional works can refer to reality without nullifying the ontological homogeneity of fictive worlds. It is also shown how readers discover reference to reality in fiction. At the same time, the contribution pays attention to different sorts of readers. Readers with a high level of literary socialization can analyze 'Jansen' more thoroughly and will then see how the suggestion of reality of the passage under discussion is undermined by the story itself. Thus it becomes clear that the ruling of the court largely depends on the choice of the relevant group of readers with respect to 'Jansen'. © 2010 by Spiegel der Letteren.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.