Abstract

to verify if hesitations would occur, preferably, in strong or weak positions of four of the prosodic constituents: phonological utterance, intonational phrase, phonological phrase and clitic group. the data were extracted from a bank composed of 147 interview situations recorded with children aged 5-6 years. Was used the principle of relative prominence for the analysis of prosodic constituents. From this principle, the hesitant occurrences identified in prominent elements in the organization of each of the prosodic constituents was considered as for strong position and, as in a weak position, the hesitant occurrences identified in parts of constituents that surround the prominent positions. The judges detected 2.399 hesitant occurrences. the following total hesitations were identified in strong and weak positions, respectively: (1) in the phonological utterance = 305 (28.37%) and 770 (71.63%); (2) in the intonational phrase = 285 (20.67%) and 1094 (79.33%); (3) in the phonological phrase = 129 (16.49%) and 653 (83.51%); and (4) in the clitic group = 154 (15.21%) and 859 (84.79%). although hesitant occurrences have been identified in strong positions in all prosodic constituents analyzed, there was prevalence due to the weak position. This result corroborates studies that claim that hesitations would occur in non-nuclear prosodic portions. Furthermore to this confirmation, the results reinforce the effectiveness of the prosodic phonology model in relation to the principle of relative prominence.

Highlights

  • Purpose: to verify if hesitations would occur, preferably, in strong or weak positions of four of the prosodic constituents: phonological utterance, intonational phrase, phonological phrase and clitic group

  • the data were extracted from a bank composed of

  • 147 interview situations recorded with children aged

Read more

Summary

Desenvolvimento da Linguagem Fala

Objetivo: verificar se as hesitações ocorreriam, preferencialmente, em posições fortes ou fracas de quatro dos constituintes prosódicos: enunciado fonológico, frase entonacional, frase fonológica e grupo clítico. Para análise dos constituintes prosódicos, foi utilizado o princípio da proeminência relativa. Resultados: foram identificadas, respectivamente, em posições fortes e fracas os seguintes totais de hesitações: (1) no enunciado fonológico = 305 (28,37%) e 770 (71,63%); (2) na frase entonacional = 285 (20,67%) e 1094 (79,33%); (3) na frase fonológica = 129 (16,49%) e 653 (83,51%); e (4) no grupo clítico = 154 (15,21%) e 859 (84,79%). Conclusão: embora as ocorrências hesitativas tenham sido identificadas em posições fortes em todos os constituintes prosódicos analisados, houve prevalência pela posição fraca. Os resultados reforçam a eficácia do modelo da fonologia prosódica em relação ao princípio da proeminência relativa

Procedimentos Éticos
Critérios de Análise
Quantificação dos Enunciados
Análise estatística
Teste t de Student
Findings
Contribuição dos autores
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call