Abstract

The article compares Herodotus’ representation of “sacred marriage” and “sacred prostitution” with relevant passages in Xenophon, Diodorus, and Strabo. The representation of the “sacred marriage” ritual in ancient near eastern sources points to a venerable custom used to induce divine epiphanies but, also, to a powerful political tool that later rulers used to establish or enhance their legitimacy. Furthermore, Xenophon’s appreciation of the divine favor that eastern rulers mustered and the symbolism they used to relate it, indicates that the Greeks neither ignored nor rejected such eastern norms. By taking into account the scholarly arguments that doubt the widespread existence of “sacred prostitution” in antiquity and point to a misreading of Herodotus by later Roman authors, who read his work through the “orientalism” of their day, we argue that Herodotus does not exhibit inherent bias against the Babylonians when reporting the famous custom requiring every Babylonian woman to prostitute herself once in her lifetime. A closer reading of the text suggests that Herodotus was more interested in castigating religious prejudice regardless of the ethnicity of its practitioners.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.