Abstract

BackgroundIn eukaryotes mRNA transcripts of protein-coding genes in which an intron has been retained in the coding region normally result in premature stop codons and are therefore degraded through the nonsense-mediated mRNA decay (NMD) pathway. There is evidence in the form of selective pressure for in-frame stop codons in introns and a depletion of length three introns that this is an important and conserved quality-control mechanism. Yet recent reports have revealed that the efficiency of NMD varies across tissues and between individuals, with important clinical consequences.Principal FindingsUsing previously published Affymetrix exon microarray data from cell lines genotyped as part of the International HapMap project, we investigated whether there are heritable, inter-individual differences in the abundance of intron-containing transcripts, potentially reflecting differences in the efficiency of NMD. We identified intronic probesets using EST data and report evidence of heritability in the extent of intron expression in 56 HapMap trios. We also used a genome-wide association approach to identify genetic markers associated with intron expression. Among the top candidates was a SNP in the DCP1A gene, which forms part of the decapping complex, involved in NMD.ConclusionsWhile we caution that some of the apparent inter-individual difference in intron expression may be attributable to different handling or treatments of cell lines, we hypothesize that there is significant polymorphism in the process of NMD, resulting in heritable differences in the abundance of intronic mRNA. Part of this phenotype is likely to be due to a polymorphism in a decapping enzyme on human chromosome 3.

Highlights

  • The transcriptome of higher eukaryotes is complex and diverse, with multiple isoforms present for most genes, resulting from heterogeneity at several stages of the generation and processing of RNA from transcription initiation to splicing and polyadenylation

  • While we caution that some of the apparent inter-individual difference in intron expression may be attributable to different handling or treatments of cell lines, we hypothesize that there is significant polymorphism in the process of nonsense-mediated mRNA decay (NMD), resulting in heritable differences in the abundance of intronic mRNA

  • Researchers investigating the potential functional implications of genetic variants have often tended to ignore splicing effects [5], recently, there have been several large-scale studies to identify common genetic variants with an effect on mRNA splicing [4,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15]. These studies parallel efforts to determine the genetic contribution to gene expression variation

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The transcriptome of higher eukaryotes is complex and diverse, with multiple isoforms present for most genes, resulting from heterogeneity at several stages of the generation and processing of RNA from transcription initiation to splicing and polyadenylation. Researchers investigating the potential functional implications of genetic variants have often tended to ignore splicing effects [5], recently, there have been several large-scale studies to identify common genetic variants with an effect on mRNA splicing [4,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15]. These studies parallel efforts to determine the genetic contribution to gene expression variation (for review see [16]). Recent reports have revealed that the efficiency of NMD varies across tissues and between individuals, with important clinical consequences

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call