Abstract

Payment for Ecosystem Services (PES) has been widely acknowledged as an effective tool for mitigating grassland degradation and enhancing ecosystem services provision. However, critical factors such as herders’ willingness to accept (WTA) preferences and their compensation expectations, are often overlooked, leading to insufficient effectiveness of PES initiatives. This study focused on grassland ecological compensation policy (GECP), quantifying herders’ WTA compensation for grassland grazing bans. Through face-to-face surveys and employing the contingent valuation method, we estimated households’ WTA for participating in a grassland conservation program aimed at bolstering ecosystem service provision. Our findings indicate that herders required an average compensation of 237 CNY mu-1 yr-1 to engage in the grazing ban program. Notably, our study revealed that herders’ environmental awareness positively influenced their willingness to participation, whereas larger family sizes were negatively correlated with WTA. Additionally, herders in better health, with higher livestock incomes or categorized as semi-herders, tended to accept lower compensation levels. These insights are crucial for improving the effectiveness of GECP and provide valuable reference points for similar analyses in economically disadvantaged and ecologically fragile regions.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.