Abstract

Host plant defenses are known to cascade up food chains to influence herbivores and their natural enemies, but how herbivore and predator traits and identity mediate such tri-trophic dynamics is largely unknown. We assessed the influence of plant defense on aphid and coccinellid performance in laboratory trials with low- vs. high-glucosinolate varieties of Brassica napus, a dietary specialist (Brevicoryne brassicae) and generalist (Myzus persicae) aphid, and five species of aphidophagous coccinellids. The performance of the specialist and generalist aphids was similar and unaffected by variation in plant defense. Aphid glucosinolate concentration and resistance to predators differed by aphid species and host plant defense, and these effects acted independently. With respect to aphid species, the dietary generalist aphid (vs. specialist) had 14% lower glucosinolate concentration and coccinellid predators ate three-fold more aphids. With respect to host plant variety, the high-glucosinolate plants (vs. low) increased aphid glucosinolate concentration by 21%, but had relatively weak effects on predation by coccinellids and these effects varied among coccinellid species. In turn, coccinellid performance was influenced by the interactive effects of plant defense and aphid species, as the cascading, indirect effect of plant defense was greater when feeding upon the specialist than generalist aphid. When feeding upon specialist aphids, low- (vs. high-) glucosinolate plants increased coccinellid mass gain by 78% and accelerated development by 14%. In contrast, when feeding upon generalist aphids, low- (vs. high-) glucosinolate plants increased coccinellid mass gain by only 11% and had no detectable effect on development time. These interactive effects of plant defense and aphid diet breadth on predator performance also varied among coccinellid species; the indirect negative effects of plant defenses on predator performance was consistent among the five predators when transmitted via the dietary specialist aphid, but these effects varied substantially among predators—in both the magnitude and direction—when transmitted via the dietary generalist aphid. Accordingly, the cascading effect of plant defense on predators was stronger in magnitude and more consistent among predator taxa when transmitted by the specialist than generalist herbivore. Overall, these findings support a central role of herbivore diet breadth in mediating both the strength and contingency of tri-trophic interactions.

Highlights

  • Tri-trophic interactions have long been recognized as the key drivers of fundamental ecological and evolutionary processes [1,2,3,4]

  • We studied two Brassica napus Linnaeus varieties of differing glucosinolate concentration, a dietary generalist (Myzus persicae Sultzer) and specialist (Brevicoryne brassicae Linnaeus) aphid species, and five species of coccinellid predators to address the following questions: How does herbivore diet breadth mediate the effects of plant defense on (1) aphid performance, (2) aphid resistance to coccinellids and (3) coccinellid performance? to assess the consistency of these dynamics, we compared our findings amongst five predators

  • The cascading effect of plant defense on predators was stronger in magnitude and more consistent among predator taxa when transmitted by the specialist than generalist herbivore

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Tri-trophic interactions have long been recognized as the key drivers of fundamental ecological and evolutionary processes [1,2,3,4]. Understanding how functional traits mediate the interactions among plants, herbivores and predators provides the mechanistic foundation for predicting the outcomes of cascading tritrophic interactions in food chains [6, 7]. Plants display a combination of chemical and morphological defensive traits that reduce herbivory through both direct effects on herbivores, and indirectly, by mediating the top-down effects of natural enemies [8]. Such defensive traits are variable both within and among species [9] as a result of variable selection by herbivores [10], plant resource availability [11], and variable selection pressure of the predators [12]. Direct and indirect defenses may act synergistically as, for example, when sub-lethal direct defenses slow herbivore development and increase susceptibility to natural enemies [19,20,21,22,23]

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call