Abstract

Simple SummaryHER2 testing in endometrial cancer (EC) has gained renewed interest as a therapeutic target. However, HER2 status has not been investigated in the context of the molecular EC classification. Here, we aimed to determine the clinicopathological features and prognostic significance of the HER2 status in the molecularly classified PORTEC-3 trial population of patients with high-risk EC. HER2 status of 407 high-risk EC was determined by HER2 immunohistochemistry and HER2 dual in situ hybridization. Twenty-four (5.9%) HER2-positive EC of various histological subtypes were identified, including serous (n = 9, 37.5%), endometrioid (n = 6, 25.0%), and clear cell (n = 5, 20.8%). HER2 positivity was highly associated with the p53-abnormal subgroup (p53abn, 23/24 cases; p < 0.0001). The correlation between p53abn and the HER2 status (ρ = 0.438; p < 0.0001) was significantly stronger (p < 0.0001) than between serous histology and the HER2 status (ρ = 0.154; p = 0.002). HER2 status did not have independent prognostic value for survival after correction for the molecular classification. Our study strongly suggests that molecular subclass-directed HER2 testing is superior to histotype-directed testing.HER2 status has not been investigated in the context of the molecular endometrial cancer (EC) classification. Here, we aimed to determine the clinicopathological features and prognostic significance of the HER2 status in the molecularly classified PORTEC-3 trial population of patients with high-risk EC (HREC). HER2 testing was performed on tumor tissues of 407 molecularly classified HREC. HER2 status was determined by HER2 immunohistochemistry (IHC; all cases) and subsequent HER2 dual in situ hybridization for cases with any (in) complete moderate to strong membranous HER2 IHC expression. The Χ2 test and Spearman’s Rho correlation coefficient were used to compare clinicopathological and molecular features. The Kaplan–Meier method, log-rank test, and Cox proportional hazards models were used for survival analysis. We identified 24 (5.9%) HER2-positive EC of various histological subtypes including serous (n = 9, 37.5%), endometrioid (n = 6, 25.0%), and clear cell (n = 5, 20.8%). HER2 positivity was highly associated with the p53-abnormal subgroup (p53abn, 23/24 cases; p < 0.0001). The correlation between p53abn and the HER2 status (ρ = 0.438; p < 0.0001) was significantly stronger (p < 0.0001) than between serous histology and the HER2 status (ρ = 0.154; p = 0.002). HER2 status did not have independent prognostic value for survival after correction for the molecular classification. Our study strongly suggests that molecular subclass-directed HER2 testing is superior to histotype-directed testing. This insight will be relevant for future trials targeting HER2.

Highlights

  • Endometrial cancer (EC) is the most common gynecological cancer in developed countries and is primarily treated with surgery

  • Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) IHC was successful, but the final HER2 status could not be determined due to failed HER2 dual in situ hybridization (DISH) testing and inadequate quality of the copy number plot generated by next-generation sequencing (NGS)

  • Moderate and strong membranous immunoreactivity was observed in 60 endometrial cancer (EC) (14.7%) and 26 EC (6.4%), respectively

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Endometrial cancer (EC) is the most common gynecological cancer in developed countries and is primarily treated with surgery. Around 15–20% of women with EC have high-risk disease with increased incidence of distant metastases and cancer-related death. High-risk features include advanced age, high-grade non-endometrioid histology, substantial lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI), and advanced stage disease. Standard adjuvant treatment for women with high-risk EC has been pelvic external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) [1]. The international randomized Adjuvant Chemoradiotherapy Versus Radiotherapy Alone in Women with High-Risk Endometrial Cancer (PORTEC-3) trial investigated the benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy in combination with EBRT (chemoradiotherapy (CTRT)) versus EBRT alone (radiotherapy (RT)) in patients with high-risk EC [2]. The identification of patients who will benefit from chemotherapy is essential. The assessment of high-risk pathologic features is subject to a substantial interobserver disagreement, complicating the identification of this subset of patients [3,4]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.