HER2 amplification in cases with low HER2 expression by immunohistochemistry (IHC): A Single Institutional Experience

Abstract

Abstract Introduction/Objective HER2 testing in invasive breast carcinoma (IBC) is the standard of care to determine patient eligibility for HER2 directed therapy with trasuzumab. Initial testing of tissue by HER2 immunohistochemistry (IHC) can be positive, negative, or equivocal. In equivocal cases as well as negative cases in our institution HER2 FISH is also performed. According to ASCO/CAP guidelines a subset of equivocal and negative IHC cases are considered HER2 positive if they meet criteria for increased HER2/CEP17 ratio and HER2 copy number by FISH, allowing more patients to be treated with HER2 directed therapies. HER2 grouping per ASCO is as follows; Group 1: HER2 copy number ≥4 signals/cell, Group 2: <4.0 signals/cell, Group 3: ≥6 signals/cell, Group 4: HER2 copy number ≥4 and <6 signals/cell, Group 5: HER2 copy number <4 signals/cell Methods/Case Report All cases of IBC resection with HER2 IHC and FISH results from Jan 2018-Dec 2021 were included in this study. All cases positive for HER2 by IHC alone (3+ staining) were excluded. The ASCO/CAP 2018 guidelines for HER2 testing in breast cancer were used to evaluate HER2 positivity by FISH and the relation to IHC scores Results (if a Case Study enter NA) A total of 2630 IBC cases with both HER2 IHC and FISH testing were included. Of these, 131 (5.0%) were in FISH group 1, 17 (0.7%) in group 2, 11 (0.4%) in group 3, 161 (6.1%) in group 4, and 2310 (87.8%) in group 5. A total of 142 (5.4%) cases that were HER2 equivocal or negative by IHC were HER2 positive by FISH. Specifically, 0.3% of cases with an IHC score of 0, 1.4% with a score of 1+, and 14.6% of cases with a score of 2+ were positive by FISH. Of the 14.6% IHC 2+ cases that were FISH positive 13.3% were in FISH group 1 (115 cases) and 1.3% (11 cases) in FISH group 3. Of FISH positive cases 1.4% had an IHC score of 0, 9.9% had an IHC score of 1 and 88.7% had a score of 2 Conclusion At our institution 14.6% of IBC with equivocal HER2 staining on IHC, 1.4% of cases with negative (1+) staining and 0.3% of cases with negative (0) were HER2 FISH positive. Since HER2 FISH is not reflexively performed on cases HER2 negative by IHC, this additional 1.7% will qualify for HER2 targeted therapy Interpretation of low HER2 expression by IHC by traditional IHC assay may miss a small percentage of cases eligible for HER2 directed therapy. Accurate interpretation of HER2 low by IHC is critical as recent clinical trials have shown that low HER2 expression with IHC scores of 1+ or 2+ without gene amplification by FISH could benefit from Trastuzumab Deruxtecan