Abstract

The effects of isoflurane and halothane anesthesia on hepatic circulation and oxygen metabolism during hepatolobectomy were investigated in the dog, in an attempt to assess which of the anesthetics was the better one for hepatic resection. Mongrel dogs (n=24) were divided into two groups and accordingly anesthetized with isoflurane (n=12) or halothane (n = 12). Each test anesthetic was administered in air. Electromagnetic flowmeters were used to measure hepatic arterial and portal venous blood flows 1) before the inhalation of each anesthetic (baseline); 2) 1 h inhalation of 1.5 MAC (minimum alveolar concentration) of each anesthetic; and 3) 1 h after hepatolobectomy with each anesthesia. Measurements of systemic hemodynamics, blood gas tensions, and the arterial ketone body ratio were made at the same time. Isoflurane maintained portal venous, hepatic arterial and total hepatic blood flows better than halothane anesthesia before and after hepatolobectomy. With halothane anesthesia, hepatolobectomy decreased prominently hepatic arterial blood flow. Hepatic arterial and mesenteric vascular resistance increased in the halothane group, but remained constant in the isoflurane group after hepatolobectomy. Hepatic oxygen delivery was significantly suppressed in the halothane group, but did not change in the isoflurane group. No significant difference was found in hepatic oxygen consumption between the two groups, but the arterial ketone body ratio decreased significantly only in the halothane group before and after hepatolobectomy. The present data indicate that isoflurane has less adverse effect than halothane anesthesia on hepatic circulation, oxygen delivery and energy charge in hepatolobectomy cases.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.