Abstract
Background and AimsThis study investigated the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) combined with CT-guided 125iodine seed implantation for treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with first-branch portal vein tumor thrombosis (PVTT).MethodsThis prospective, controlled, multicenter study included HCC patients with Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer stage C disease and PVTT in the right and/or left portal veins. Patients were treated with either TACE and sorafenib or TACE and CT-guided 125iodine seed implantation and regularly evaluated for clinical response and adverse events, with treatment termination resulting from declining clinical status, loss to follow-up, or death.ResultsThis study demonstrated a significant between-group difference in median overall survival (OS); therefore, it was terminated early. A total of 123 patients were included in this study, with 52 patients in the TACE-sorafenib group and 71 patients in the TACE-125iodine group, without significant differences in baseline characteristics between groups. The median OS was 8.3 months (95% CI: 6.105–10.495) in the TACE-sorafenib group and 13.8 months (95% CI: 9.519–18.081) in the TACE-125iodine group. In a subgroup analysis of type IIa versus type IIb PVTT, the median OS was 17.5 months for type IIa and 7.1 months for IIb in the TACE-125iodine group. The median OS was 9.3 months for IIa and 4.0 months for IIb in the TACE-sorafenib group. Univariate and multivariate analyses confirmed that the PVTT type and treatment strategy were significant independent factors affecting OS. The objective response rates (ORR) for intrahepatic lesions and PVTT showed significant differences between groups. Most patients in both groups experienced minor adverse events related to TACE. The overall incidence of sorafenib-related adverse events or toxic effects was 90.4% in TACE-sorafenib group. In the TACE-125iodine group, the incidence of pneumothorax and minor hepatic subcapsular hemorrhage were 7.04% and 9.86%, respectively.ConclusionsThis study showed that TACE-125iodine treatment significantly enhanced survival of patients with HCC and type II PVTT, especially subtype IIa, with minimal adverse events.Clinical Trial RegistrationChinese Clinical Trials Database, identifier ChiCTR-ONN-16007929.
Highlights
In patients presenting with early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), curative treatments are recommended, including transplantation, surgical resection, and ablation [1, 2]
In the transarterial chemoembolization (TACE)-sorafenib group three patients were lost to followup, and one patient quit the study for other treatments in the TACE-125iodine group
We compared the outcomes of patients with advanced HCC and type II Portal vein tumor thrombosis (PVTT) treated with either TACE combined with sorafenib or TACE combined with computed tomography (CT)-guided 125iodine seed implantation as a first-line therapy
Summary
In patients presenting with early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), curative treatments are recommended, including transplantation, surgical resection, and ablation [1, 2]. Portal vein tumor thrombosis (PVTT), a common complication in patients with advanced HCC, is observed in 64.7% of cases at autopsy and has a low median survival of 2.7–4.0 months who was untreated [3, 4]. Clinical study had shown that the survival time of HCC patients with PVTT treated with sorafenib alone is limited [3, 14]. Patients with PVTT who undergo treatment with sorafenib in combination with transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) demonstrate better survival, even in those with more advanced and recurrent disease [15,16,17]. This study investigated the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) combined with CT-guided 125iodine seed implantation for treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with first-branch portal vein tumor thrombosis (PVTT)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.