Abstract
Background: Liver disease and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) are important contributors to the mortality gap between Indigenous and non-Indigenous Australians. However, there is a lack of population based high quality data assessing the differences in HCC epidemiology and outcomes according to Indigenous status. The aim of this study was therefore to perform a large epidemiological study of HCC investigating differences between Indigenous and non-Indigenous Australians with HCC. Methods: Data linkage methodology was used to link data from cancer registries with hospital separation summaries across three Australian jurisdictions during 2000-2017. Cumulative survival (Kaplan-Meier) and the differences in survival (Multivariable Cox-regression) by Indigenous status were assessed. Findings: A total of 229 Indigenous and 3587 non-Indigenous HCC cases were included in the analyses. Significant epidemiological differences identified for Indigenous HCC cases included younger age at onset, higher proportion of females, higher rurality, lower socioeconomic status, and higher comorbidity burden (all p<0.001). The distribution of cofactors was also significantly different for Indigenous Australians including higher prevalence of alcohol misuse, hepatitis B, and diabetes and more frequent presence of multiple HCC cofactors (all p<0.001). Indigenous Australians received curative HCC therapies less frequently (6.6% vs. 14.5%, p<0.001) and had poorer 5-year survival (10.0% vs. 17.3%, p<0.001; unadjusted hazard ratio (HR) =1.42 96%CI 1.21-1.65) compared to non-Indigenous Australians. Indigenous status was not independently associated with poorer survival on multivariable analysis. The survival difference was largely accounted for by other factors including rurality, comorbidity burden and lack of curative therapy (adjusted-HR=1.20 95%CI 0.97-1.47). Interpretation: Such data provide a call to action to help design and implement education, liver management and HCC surveillance programs for Indigenous people to help close the liver cancer mortality gap. Funding: The work was supported by an unrestricted educational grant from the Gastroenterology Society of Australia. Declaration of Interests: There are no financial disclosures. Ethics Approval Statement: This study was approved by the Human Research Ethics Committee of the Northern Territory Department of Health and Menzies School of Health Research (2019-3365), SA Department for Health (HREC/19/SAH/45), Aboriginal Health Research Ethics Committee (04-19-829), QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute (P3506), and Queensland Health (HREC/17/QPAH/23).
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.