Abstract

Background MRI with hepatobiliary contrast material is more sensitive than MRI with extracellular contrast material in the detection of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Purpose To determine whether postsurgical outcomes differ between patients who undergo MRI with hepatobiliary contrast material and those who undergo MRI with extracellular contrast material by analyzing disease-free survival (DFS) rates after curative resection of HCC. Materials and Methods From January 2014 to December 2015, 170 treatment-naïve patients who underwent contrast-enhanced preoperative liver MRI and curative hepatic resection for HCC were retrospectively included and observed until September 2018. DFS rates were compared between the two groups, which were classified based on the type of MRI contrast agent used. The MRI with hepatobiliary contrast material group was further divided into a hypointense nodule-positive group and a hypointense nodule-negative group according to the presence of residual hepatobiliary phase (HBP) hypointense nodules without arterial phase hyperenhancement (APHE) after surgery. DFS rates were calculated by using the Kaplan-Meier method and were compared among the three groups by using a log-rank test. Results Patients were included in either the MRI with extracellular contrast material group (n = 53; mean age, 60 years ± 9 [standard deviation]) or the hepatobiliary contrast material group (n = 117; mean age, 60 years ± 8; 26 patients were in the hypointense nodule-positive group). Over a median follow-up period of 34.1 months, median DFS rates did not differ between the extracellular contrast material group (35.8 months) and the hepatobiliary contrast material group (43.5 months) (P = .46). However, median DFS in the extracellular contrast material group was longer than that in the hypointense nodule-positive group (35.8 months vs 25.8 months, P < .001) and shorter than that in the hypointense nodule-negative group (35.8 months vs 48.6 months, P = .02). Conclusion Patients who undergo preoperative MRI with hepatobiliary contrast material and resection of hepatobiliary phase hypointense nodules without arterial phase hyperenhancement may show better disease-free survival. © RSNA, 2019 Online supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Motosugi in this issue.

Highlights

  • Tudy Participants This retrospective study was approved by the institutional review board of Yonsei University College of Medicine, a tertiary medical center

  • Key Points nn Median disease-free survival after surgical resection of hepatocellular carcinoma did not differ between patients examined with preoperative MRI and extracellular contrast material and those examined with MRI with hepatobiliary contrast material (36 months vs 44 months, P = .46)

  • No differences in baseline characteristics were observed between the two MRI groups or between patients with or without hepatobiliary phase (HBP) hypointense nodules without arterial phase hyperenhancement (APHE) in the MRI with hepatobiliary contrast material group (P . .05)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Tudy Participants This retrospective study was approved by the institutional review board of Yonsei University College of Medicine, a tertiary medical center. The diagnosis of liver cirrhosis was established via histopathologic proof or with radiologic evidence (liver cirrhosis at CT, MRI, or transient elastography) combined with clinical and laboratory findings. Among these patients, 16 were excluded because they had a current or past history of extrahepatic primary malignancy (n = 2), had surgically confirmed non-HCC lesions (benign lesions or other malignancies, n = 6), experienced HCC rupture (n = 2), or had undergone MRI with both an extracellular and a hepatobiliary contrast agent in the same session (n = 6). Our final study sample consisted of 170 patients with chronic liver disease who underwent curative he-

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.