Hepatic portal vein branching patterns according to different liver assessment methods and classifications of branching type

Abstract

BackgroundIt is known that there are varying frequencies of hepatic portal vein branching patterns found in the literature. Studies use different methods and classifications to evaluate the anatomy of the portal vein, which limits accurate comparison between studies and the determination of true frequency of branching patterns in different populations. The aim of the present study was to investigate the intrahepatic branching of the portal vein in corrosive samples using different methods – somatoscopic and computed tomography (CT) and compare with similar studies as well as compare the reclassified data according to the most popular classifications used in the literature. MethodsA total of 105 liver corrosion specimens from the 1960–1980 period (51 male and 54 female individuals; min-max age variation – 21–90 y., M=59,46 y.) were investigated. The branching patterns of the hepatic portal vein (HPV), left (HPV-LB) and right branch of hepatic portal vein (HPV-RB), and their segmental branches were examined and scanned by CT. Standard HPV ramification was considered, when HPV divided into HPV-LB and HPV-RB, HPV-RB bifurcated to the anterior and posterior branches, and further segmental ramification into the superior and inferior branches was considered standard. We compared the HPV main branch length and diameter measurements between manual and CT method. A review of the literature was performed on portal vein branching variations. ResultsThe standard HPV ramification pattern was detected in 85.7% of the cases in both somatoscopic and CT evaluation. Variations related to the main branches were HPV trifurcation – 7.6%, posterior branch of right branch of hepatic portal vein from HPV – 4.8% and 5.7%, HPV quadrifurcation 1.9% and 1% respectively, in somatoscopic and CT evaluation. There was a significant difference between HPV-LB length and diameter in CT and manual measurements. According to the literature, more variations are seen using the CT method versus somatoscopic corrosion cast evaluation. The varying frequency in studies may be explained by a lack of one unanimous classification of branching patterns (some authors do not consider segmental variations as standard HPV ramification) and different evaluation methods. ConclusionSomatoscopic evaluation of the branching patterns of the hepatic portal vein in corroded specimens and their CT reconstructions did not differ significantly (which allows relatively accurate comparison of old specimens with newer data). However, the ability to evaluate the reconstructed 3D images of the specimens allowed a more accurate assessment of segmental branching and measurements of lengths and diameters. Standard HPV branching (according to a self-developed classification) in this study was 85.7%. Depending on the classification, the rate of standard branching in the same corrosive samples varied from 63.8% to 84.8% of all cases, indicating that the lack of a unified and stable classification makes it difficult to compare the results of different studies. Deviations from standard branching are very important in surgical procedures and liver transplantation.