Hepatic Foci of Cellular and Enzymatic Alteration and Nodules in Rats Treated With Clofibrate or Diethylnitrosamine Followed by Phenobarbital: Their Rate of Onset and Their Reversibility

Abstract

The histologic appearance and cytochemical characteristics of foci of hepatic cellular alteration, hepatic nodules, and hepatocellular carcinomas occurring in male Sprague-Dawley rats treated with the hypolipidemic agent clofibrate (CAS: 637-07-0), with phenobarbital (CAS: 50-06-6), or with diethylnitrosamine [(DENA) CAS: 55-18-5] followed by phenobarbital were studied after treatment periods from 1 month to 2 years. Rats treated with clofibrate revealed foci of cellular alteration that were more often basophilic and occurred slightly sooner (wk 42) than those in untreated controls (wk 60). Of 36 rats that had received 68 or more weeks of continuous clofibrate, 19 had hepatic nodules. Of the 11 nodules examined cytochemically, none was gamma-glutamyltransferase (gamma-GT) positive and 2 were positive to glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G-6-PD) under oxygen. In rats withdrawn from clofibrate for 16-18 weeks after 68-95 weeks of clofibrate, 0 of 14 had nodules. In several of these rats zones of hepatic scarring were observed, suggesting the reversibility of the nodules. Phenobarbital alone had little effect on the incidence of foci of cellular alteration, although the number of gamma-GT-positive foci was increased. DENA followed by phenobarbital led to the early appearance of foci of cellular alteration (from wk 4), of nodules (from wk 13), and of hepatocellular carcinomas (from wk 26). gamma-GT activity was raised in most of these nodules and carcinomas, while G-6-PD activity was raised in only 3 of 9 nodules but in all 9 carcinomas examined. DENA-phenobarbital given for 13 or 26 weeks followed by withdrawal of phenobarbital for 28 and 26 weeks, respectively, produced an essentially similar pattern of lesions. In view of the growing recognition of the nonspecificity gamma-GT as a marker of carcinogen-initiated foci, the value of G-6-PD (under oxygen) as a marker merits further investigation.