Abstract
W HEN MAXWELL GEISMAR published his lengthy attack on James, Henry James and the Jacobites,1 he fastened with glee upon the negative associations surrounding, for the modern reader, James's use of the word vulgar. After quoting it2 from The Wings of the Dove, he concluded, somewhat savagely: And isn't a writer so horribly obsessed by the notion of'vulgarity' itself--and to this novelist, perhaps, nothing human was not vulgar-isn't such a writer more than half aware of his own vulgarity ? I am sure many James scholars feel that the best way to treat Geismar's book is to ignore it.3 In this matter, however, Geismar echoed, and only slightly exceeded, the conclusion of one whom he considers a high priest of the James cult, F. O. Matthiessen, whose Henry James4 has done as much as any critical study to elevate James's literary standing. For Matthiessen wrote, in the manner of a disciple torn between devotion to the master and devotion to the truth: Another word that shows the drift
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
