Abstract

ABSTRACT This article focuses on the decade from 1992 to 2002 when Henry Cleere served as the ICOMOS coordinator for World Heritage nominations. Based on his interview with the author as part of her World Heritage Oral Archives project as well as her personal recollections, the article recounts his initiation into the politics of World Heritage at his first session when he encountered a fait accompli for the nomination of Angkor (Cambodia). It highlights the triumphs and frustrations of his work over the decade, as recounted in no uncertain terms by Henry himself. The single-evaluator model that he inherited from his predecessor challenged his capacity to manage an ever-increasing workload and took its toll on his health. Subsequently the model was expanded by ICOMOS to include a team of evaluators. Henry’s years as ICOMOS coordinator were remarkably productive. He carried out research and prepared advice for the Committee on about 350 nomination proposals. Through his experience and professional knowledge, he also proposed improvements to the evaluation process for World Heritage cultural properties, in particular by introducing ICOMOS missions to the sites and by insisting on conservation and management issues. The article contains contextual information drawn from UNESCO documents as well as lively quotations from Henry and several of his contemporaries drawn from the World Heritage Oral Archives. They confirm the significant contribution that Henry made to World Heritage and his heroic efforts to sustain the lone-ranger model in the face of a rapidly expanding system.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call