Abstract

The biologic properties of two major proteoglycans of bovine aorta, heparan sulfate proteoglycan and chondroitin sulfate-dermatan sulfate proteoglycan were compared. The heparan sulfate proteoglycan was isolated either by elastase digestion or by 4.0 M guanidine hydrochloride extraction, of aorta tissue, fractionated by CsCl isopycnic centrifugation and purified by chondrointinase ABC treatment. The first method resulted in considerably greater yield (about 70% of the total heparan sulfate proteoglycan of the tissue) than the second procedure (12% of total). The chondroitin sulfate-dermatan sulfate proteoglycan was obtained by 4.0 M guanidine-HCl extraction of aorta tissue followed by CsCl isopycnic centrifugation. The chemical composition of both heparan sulfate proteoglycan preparations was similar. Unlike the chondroitin sulfate-dermatan sulfate proteoglycan, which eluted in the void volume of Sepharose CL-6B column, the heparan sulfate proteoglycan preparations were each resolved into a high molecular weight fraction ( k av = 0.18 and 0.13) and a low molecular weight fraction ( k av = 0.47 and 0.36). The heparan sulfate proteoglycan preparations exhibited significantly more potent anticoagulant and platelet aggregation inhibitory activities than the chondroitin sulfate-dermatan sulfate proteoglycan. The protein core of the proteoglycan molecules did not seem to be essential for their hemostatic properties. The complex forming ability of the heparan sulfate proteoglycan with serum low density lipoproteins (LDL) was much less than that of chondroitin sulfate-dermatan sulfate proteoglycan in the presence and absence of Ca 2+. Interaction between heparan sulfate proteoglycan and LDL was also much more sensitive to changes in the ionic strength of the medium than that of chondroitin sulfate-dermatan sulfate proteoglycan and the lipoprotein. Since the total sulfate content of both proteoglycans is almost similar, the smaller molecular size and hence the lower overall charge density of the heparan sulfate proteoglycan appears to be partly responsible for its low affinity for LDL. The differences in biologic properties of the two proteoglycans might have implications in the pathophysiology of cardiovascular diseases.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call