Hemostasis and diagnosis of preeclampsia

Abstract

The diagnosis of preeclampsia, with all of its consequences, is at times difficult to establish, especially when the patient has underlying chronic hypertension and is not known from prior prenatal care visits. Many screening tests have been proposed. These should be sensitive, relatively specific, easy to perform, of low cost, and have a reasonable interval from prediction to disease onset. Laboratory assays would obviously be useful. We evaluated hemostasis tests for the diagnosis of preeclampsia, and compared fibronectin, antithrombin III and α 2-antiplasmin in 48 preeclamptics and 86 control nulliparas. Receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve analysis suggested that fibronectin is the most effective of these tests. A similar analysis comparing the results of previous studies using serum iron, angiotensin infusion, urinary calcium/creatinine ratio, the roll-over test and uric acid suggested a possible role for fibronectin in the diagnosis of preeclampsia. While not ideal, there seems to be, at present, no other, easy to perform laboratory test that outperforms fibronectin in predicting preeclampsia.