Hemoptisis amenazante: estudio de 154 pacientes

Abstract

Background and objectivesThe natural history of life-threatening hemoptysis (LTH), a medical emergency, is ill defined. The objective of the study was to evaluate, in a university teaching hospital setting, the etiology, methods used, and evolution of LTH. Patients and methodsProspective study in which we enrolled 154 patients admitted for LTH over 3 consecutive years. Bronchoscopy and arteriography procedures were performed, as prescribed by the attending physician. Patient evolution was followed 5 years post-event. Result79.2% were male. Average age was 57 (SD 15) years. Bronchiectasis and active tuberculosis and its consequences were the predominant etiologies. A total of 4.5% patients died as a result of LTH. Bronchoscopy was more effective in identifying the bleeding than arteriography when the examination was performed during an episode of hemoptysis (84.2 versus 20.4%) (P<.001). When embolization or bronchoscopy were used as first measure, embolization was more effective in stabilizing bleeding than bronchoscopy (87 versus 53.5%) (P<.001) in admitted patients. LTH relapse was 10.7%, while it was lower with embolization. ConclusionsLeading causes were bronchiectasis and tuberculosis. While bronchoscopy during a hemoptysis episode was effective in identifying the source of the bleeding, artery embolization was more effective in stabilizing the patient both at the short and long term.