Abstract

Lesion and electrophysiological studies in rodents have identified the amygdala and hippocampus (HPC) as key structures for Pavlovian fear conditioning, but human functional neuroimaging studies have not consistently found activation of these structures. This could be because hemodynamic responses cannot detect the sparse neuronal activity proposed to underlie conditioned fear. Alternatively, differences in experimental design or fear levels could account for the discrepant findings between rodents and humans. To help distinguish between these alternatives, we used tissue oxygen amperometry to record hemodynamic responses from the basolateral amygdala (BLA), dorsal HPC (dHPC) and ventral HPC (vHPC) in freely-moving rats during the acquisition and extinction of conditioned fear. To enable specific comparison with human studies we used a discriminative paradigm, with one auditory cue [conditioned stimulus (CS)+] that was always followed by footshock, and another auditory cue (CS−) that was never followed by footshock. BLA tissue oxygen signals were significantly higher during CS+ than CS− trials during training and early extinction. In contrast, they were lower during CS+ than CS− trials by the end of extinction. dHPC and vHPC tissue oxygen signals were significantly lower during CS+ than CS− trials throughout extinction. Thus, hemodynamic signals in the amygdala and HPC can detect the different patterns of neuronal activity evoked by threatening vs. neutral stimuli during fear conditioning. Discrepant neuroimaging findings may be due to differences in experimental design and/or fear levels evoked in participants. Our methodology offers a way to improve translation between rodent models and human neuroimaging.

Highlights

  • Understanding the neural basis of aversive learning is a fundamental goal in neuroscience, and Pavlovian fear conditioning is the dominant experimental paradigm (Davis, 1992; Phelps & LeDoux, 2005)

  • There were no systematic differences in TO2 signals based on exact placement within the basolateral amygdala (BLA) or subfield placements within dorsal HPC (dHPC) or ventral HPC (vHPC)

  • In the BLA, TO2 signals were higher during conditioned stimulus (CS)+ than CSÀ trials during training and at the start of extinction, but were significantly lower during CS+ than CSÀ trials by the end of extinction, a pattern that may reflect the expression of the ‘CS+ ? no unconditioned stimulus (US)’ association learned during extinction

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Understanding the neural basis of aversive learning is a fundamental goal in neuroscience, and Pavlovian fear conditioning is the dominant experimental paradigm (Davis, 1992; Phelps & LeDoux, 2005). An initially neutral cue such as a tone is paired with a painful, unconditioned stimulus (US) such as electric shock. The cue becomes a conditioned stimulus (CS+) with its own affective significance. A second cue (CSÀ), never paired with the US, can be used to assess the specificity of the ‘CS + ? This simple paradigm can be used in rodents and humans in essentially the same form, and it is assumed that it engages the same brain structures

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call