Hemodynamic effects of balloon pulmonary angioplasty for the treatment of total and subtotal pulmonary artery occlusions in inoperable chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension

Abstract

BackgroundBalloon pulmonary angioplasty (BPA) has become a therapeutic option for inoperable chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH). Despite significant improvement in the technique, treatment of subtotal (STO) and total (TO) pulmonary artery occlusions with BPA may pose risk, but the efficacy is less known. AimWe aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of BPA in STO/TO. MethodsWe included consecutive patients with inoperable CTEPH, who underwent BPA treatment. To evaluate the efficacy and safety we grouped all BPA sessions into these in which recanalization of at least one STO or TO was performed and into those without. The primary efficacy outcome was a decrease of pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) after BPA sessions with STO/TO recanalization as compared to those without. ResultsWe analysed 169 BPA sessions in 50 CTEPH patients. Out of a total number of 831 lesions subjected for BPA, 169 were classified as STOs or TOs [123 (15,6%) and 39 (4,7%) respectively]. At least one STO/TO recanalization was successfully performed during 90 BPA sessions. Three (2,3%) STOs and 8 (20,5%) TOs were not recanalized despite repeated attempts. Recanalization of at least one STO/TO at the level of segmental pulmonary artery was associated with a significant PVR improvement as compared to subsegmental-only STO/TO recanalizations or no recanalizations (−126 ± 192 vs −38 ± 135 dyn·s·cm − 5, p = 0.007). The rate of complications was similar in STO/TO and non-STO/TO lesions (4.1% vs 2.4%, p = 0.22). ConclusionsThe use of BPA for the recanalization of subtotal and total PA occlusions is safe and feasible. Recanalization of segmental occlusive lesions leads to a significant improvement in PVR as compared to dilatation of nonocclusive ones.