Hemodynamic and efficacies of domestic levosimendan versus dobutamine in patients with acute decompensated heart failure

Abstract

To compare the hemodynamic effects of domestic levosimendan versus dobutamine on patients with acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF). A total of 78 ADHF patients with pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP) ≥ 15 mm Hg and cardiac index (CI) ≤ 2.5 L×min(-1)×m(-2) were enrolled into this blind, positive-controlled, randomized and multicenter study to receive 24 h intravenous levosimendan or dobutamine therapy. They were randomized into 2 groups: levosimendan and dobutamine (n = 39 each). In the levosimendan group, the PCWP 24 h decreased significantly ((14.2 ± 7.6) vs (23.1 ± 8.1) mm Hg, P < 0.01)and CI increased significantly versus the baseline levels ((2.8 ± 0.7) L×min(-1)×m(-2) vs (2.0 ± 0.4) L×min(-1)×m(-2), P < 0.01). As compared with the dobutamine group, the change percentages versus baseline in PCWP, pulmonary arterial mean pressure (PAMP), systemic vascular resistance (SVR) at 24 h (median) decreased or increased significantly in the levosimendan group 45.5% vs 22.1% (P < 0.05); 20.8% vs 15.0% (P < 0.05); 34.5% vs 12.7% (P < 0.01); CI increased 39.8% vs 13.5% (P < 0.01). As compared with the baseline level, LVEF increased at 24 h in the levosimendan group (27.4% ± 6.1% vs 32.5% ± 8.7%, P < 0.05). Both PCWP and CI at 24 h correlated significantly with NT-proBNP at Day 3 (r = 0.31, P < 0.01; r = -0.29, P < 0.05). Dyspnea improved greatly at 24 h in the levosimendan group than that in the dobutamine group. As compared with dobutamine, domestic levosimendan may bring about better outcomes of hemodynamics and dyspnea.