Abstract

BackgroundThe use of methods, both sensitive and specific, for rabies diagnosis are important tools for the control and prophylaxis of the disease. Reverse-Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT-PCR) has been used in rabies diagnosis with good results, even in decomposed materials. Additionally, molecular techniques have been used for epidemiological studies and to gain a better knowledge of viral epidemiology.FindingsThe aim of this work was to evaluate the RT-PCR and hnRT-PCR for rabies virus detection in original tissues stored at -20°C for different periods considering their use for rabies virus detection in stored and decomposed samples. RT-PCR and hnRT-PCR were evaluated in 151 brain samples from different animal species, thawed and left at room temperature for 72 hours for decomposition.The RT-PCR and hnRT-PCR results were compared with previous results from Direct Fluorescent Antibody Test and Mouse Inoculation Test. From the 50 positive fresh samples, 26 (52%) were positive for RT-PCR and 45 (90%) for hnRT-PCR. From the 48 positive decomposed samples, 17 (34, 3%) were positive for RT-PCR and 36 (75%) for hnRT-PCR. No false-positives results were found in the negatives samples evaluated to the molecular techniques.ConclusionThese results show that the hnRT-PCR was more sensitive than RT-PCR, and both techniques presented lower sensibility in decomposed samples. The hnRT-PCR demonstrated efficacy in rabies virus detection in stored and decomposed materials suggesting it's application for rabies virus retrospective epidemiological studies.

Highlights

  • The use of methods, both sensitive and specific, for rabies diagnosis are important tools for the control and prophylaxis of the disease

  • These results show that the hnRT-Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) was more sensitive than Reverse-Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT-PCR), and both techniques presented lower sensibility in decomposed samples

  • All previously negative samples (101 samples) for Direct Fluorescent Antibody Test (DFA) and Mouse Inoculation Test (MIT) were negative for RT-PCR and hnRT-PCR (100% of specificity)

Read more

Summary

Conclusion

These results show that the hnRT-PCR was more sensitive than RT-PCR, and both techniques presented lower sensibility in decomposed samples. The hnRT-PCR demonstrated efficacy in rabies virus detection in stored and decomposed materials suggesting it's application for rabies virus retrospective epidemiological studies

Findings
Methods
Results
C2 C3 C4 C5 C6 C7 C8
Pringle CR
Organisation Mondiale de la Santé Animale
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call