Hemihepatic versus total hepatic inflow occlusion for laparoscopic hepatectomy: A randomized controlled trial

Abstract

BackgroundAn appropriate bleeding control technique for laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) is needed to decrease intraoperative blood loss and avoid large hemorrhages. To date, hemihepatic inflow occlusion (HIO) versus total hepatic inflow occlusion (TIO) for LLR is still controversial. Thus, we performed this randomized controlled trial (ChiCTR-IOR-17013866) to compare the perioperative outcomes between HIO and TIO for LLR. MethodsFrom December 2017 to August 2019, patients met the criteria via surgical exploration in the operation room and were randomly assigned to both groups. Perioperative data between both groups were recorded and compared, and subgroup analysis was further performed. Results258 patients were allocated to the TIO (n = 129) and HIO (n = 129) groups, respectively. There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of intraoperative blood loss, operative time, postoperative complications, changes in postoperative liver function or early mortality. However, for patients whose transection plane was located on the liver Cantlie's plane, subgroup analysis results indicated that TIO had a shorter operative time (median, 220 vs. 240 min, P = 0.030) and occlusion time (median, 45 vs. 60 min, P = 0.011) and less intraoperative blood loss (median, 200 vs. 300 ml, P = 0.002) than HIO, whereas the morbidity and mortality of the two groups were comparable. ConclusionBoth the TIO and HIO approaches could be safely performed for LLR in selected patients when performed by experienced surgeons. The TIO technique for LLR had the advantage of being easier to master than the HIO approach. Additionally, when the transection plane was located on the liver Cantlie's plane, TIO seems to have some superior perioperative outcomes.