Abstract

Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) and chimeric antigen receptor T cell (CAR T) therapy are the main modalities of adoptive cellular immunotherapy that have widely permeated the clinical space. The advent of both technologies revolutionized treatment of many hematologic malignancies, both offering the chance at sustained remissions for patients who would otherwise invariably succumb to their diseases. The understanding and exploitation of the nonspecific alloreactivity of allo-HCT and the graft-versus-tumor effect is contrasted by the genetically engineered precision of CAR T therapy. Historically, those with relapsed and refractory hematologic malignancies have often been considered for allo-HCT, although outcomes vary dramatically and are associated with potential acute and chronic toxicities. Such patients, mainly with B-lymphoid malignancies, may now be offered CAR T therapy. Yet, a lack of prospective data to guide decisions thereafter requires individualized approaches on whether to proceed to allo-HCT or observe. The continued innovations to make CAR T therapy more effective and accessible will continue to alter such approaches, but similar innovations in allo-HCT will likely result in similarly improved clinical outcomes. In this review, we describe the history of the two platforms, dissect the clinical indications emphasizing their intertwining and competitive roles described in trials and practice guidelines, and highlight innovations in which they complement or inform one another.

Highlights

  • The expanding field of immuno-oncology has unlocked the possibility of treating and potentially curing patients with the most life-threatening relapsed and refractory hematologic malignancies

  • We address the trial data for chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR T) therapy based on non-Hodgkin’s lymphomas (NHL) subtype as well as the dynamic status of allo-HCT in these diseases

  • The historically inconsistent survival and NRM outcomes in allo-HCT, combined with the substantial treatment burden experienced by the typical MM patient, suggest that this practice will likely be replaced by CAR T therapy, should it deliver on its promise of high responses and some durable remissions

Read more

Summary

INTRODUCTION

The expanding field of immuno-oncology has unlocked the possibility of treating and potentially curing patients with the most life-threatening relapsed and refractory hematologic malignancies. This recommendation is based on observational data suggesting a very high risk of relapse with conventional chemotherapy, and “genetically randomized” prospective trials repeatedly demonstrating a survival benefit in high-risk subsets for those who received HLA-matched sibling allo-HCT In both pediatric and adult patients with B-ALL, relapsed and refractory disease carries a dismal prognosis [35]. Rel/ref MCL – better outcomes with chemosensitive disease, Refractory or 2nd or greater relapse in ≤25 years-old (tisagenlecleucel) Efficacy seen in post alloHCT In clinical development for adult patients: dual-targeting CAR, relapse post CD19 CAR, “offthe-shelf” allogeneic CAR T 60%–80% (adults) 70%–90% (pediatrics) 40%–70% at 2 years. Allo-HCT, allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation; aGVHD, acute graft-vs-host disease; AML, acute myeloid leukemia; B-ALL, B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia; CR, complete response; CRS, cytokine release syndrome; DLBCL, diffuse large B-cell lymphoma; FL, follicular lymphoma; MCL, mantle cell lymphoma; N/A, not available; NRM, non-relapse mortality; OS, overall survival; PFS, progression-free survival; PR, partial response; rel/ref, relapsed/refractory. Prior allo-HCT, % CR(MRD-), % Allo-HCT post-CR,% Relapse after CR: overall/after allo-HCT %

51 Pediatric and YA
Findings
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call