Abstract

Abstract Objective Chronic subdural hematoma (cSDH) is common, predominantly affects the elderly, often recurs after treatment, and can have serious complications, including death. Inflammation plays an important role in cSDH and it has been previously shown that some laboratory indices are useful as prognostic markers. The aim was to research the role of hematologic and inflammatory markers in cSDH. Materials and Methods A single-center archival database review to retrieve data on cSDH cases operated on between 2018 and 2020, including: (1) sociodemography (age, gender), (2) clinics (Glasgow Coma Score [GCS], anticoagulants, chronic conditions), (3) laboratory (leukocyte, neutrophil, platelet, C-reactive protein, hemoglobin, red cell distribution width [RDW], neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio [PLR], systemic immune-inflammatory index [SII]), (4) cSDH (size, location, midline shift), and (5) treatment (craniotomy/craniostomy, drainage). Primary outcome was Glasgow Outcome Score (GOS) at discharge and at 1 year, and secondary outcomes were 1 year mortality, resurgery, and recurrence. Hematological and inflammatory indices were compared across two cSDH thickness groups. Results Seventy-two patients were included, 25 women and 47 men, median age 77 years. Seventeen (23.6%) patients had chronic anticoagulant treatment. The majority had a chronic comorbidity: 19 (26.4%) diabetes, 48 (66.7%) hypertension, and 56 (77.8%) other chronic diseases. Median preoperative GCS was 15. Median cSDH thickness was 22.9 mm, sidedness was equally distributed, and midline shift occurred in 60 (83.3 %) patients, with median midline shift of 8.4 mm. The majority of patients underwent a single craniostomy (n = 44, 61.1%), and in all patients a subdural drainage was placed. Median GOS at discharge and at 1 year postoperatively was 5. Mortality was 11.1%, and 16.7% of patients were lost to follow-up. Within the 1-year follow-up, 27.8% of patients had disease recurrence, 25% underwent a repeat surgery. In the “above” versus “below” 15 mm cSDH thickness group there were significant differences in P count (211.5 vs. 279.5 × 109/L, p = 0.009), RDW (13.3 vs. 12.6, p = 0.031), SII (1782 vs. 2653, p = 0.025), and PLR (26.2 vs. 36.7, p = 0.042). Conclusion Hematological indices bear a diagnostic and prognostic potential in cSDH management.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.