Helmets improve estimations of depth and visual angle to safe targets.

Abstract

Egocentric distance estimation has been shown to depend on wearing safety gear, which promotes compensatory behavior, and on target type, which regulates fight-or-flight responses. We hypothesized that the two factors interact, possibly in asymmetric fashion, and set out to uncover the limits of this interaction in a perceptual task where individuals wearing helmets or baseball caps estimated egocentric distance to non-threatening and threatening animals depicted on cards (i.e., safe and unsafe targets). We found that, compared to participants wearing caps, participants wearing helmets overshoot distance estimations and were able to distinguish not only between targets situated at two depth levels as participants wearing caps could, but also between safe targets situated at wide and narrow visual angles. Our findings help define the interaction between safety devices and target type, thereby contributing to the debate between advocates of prevention models and those who maintain that these are offset by compensatory strategies.