Abstract

This long-term prospective study describes the effect of myotomy in patients who fail to respond to repeated pneumatic dilations and compares their clinical course with that of patients responding to dilation therapy. Nineteen consecutive patients who had never reached a clinical remission after repeated pneumatic dilation underwent myotomy. Their clinical course was compared with that of patients who had reached a clinical remission after a single (n = 34) or multiple (n = 14) pneumatic dilation(s). Symptoms were graded with a previously described symptom score ranging from 0 to 12. Remission was defined as a score of 3 or less persisting for at least 6 months. Duration of remission was summarized using Kaplan Meier survival curves. Association between baseline factors and the need for surgery was evaluated using logistic regression. Complete follow-up was obtained for 98.5% of the patients. The median duration of follow-up was similar in patients treated by myotomy (10.0 years), in patients reaching a clinical remission after a single dilation (10.6 years), but differed in patients undergoing repeated dilations (6.9 years). The 10-year remission rate was 77% (95% CI 53-100%) in patients undergoing myotomy, 72% (95% CI: 56-87%) in patients "successfully" treated with a single pneumatic dilation and 45% (95% CI: 16-73%) in patients undergoing several dilations. Among all baseline factors investigated, young age was associated with an increased need of surgery. Myotomy is an effective treatment modality in patients with achalasia who have failed to respond to pneumatic dilation. Young patients may benefit from primary surgical therapy.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.