Hell’s Bells: Notes on Tone

Abstract

Hell’s Bells: Notes on Tone Mary Ruefle (bio) In early spring, in Croatia, old men and young men get up in the dark and get dressed in sheepskins, they don huge sheepskin masks and around their waists they tie giant sheep-bells. They proceed to parade through remote villages, making a racket. They are the Halubian bell-ringers, and their job is to ward off the evil spirits of winter so that the benevolent spirits of spring can arrive safely. This is their warm welcome, a ritual no less bizarre than writing a poem. Here we are in early spring. We have survived the winter. Some of us; those who have not are not, strictly speaking, here. Sooner than you think, it will be summer. Last summer I went back to a state park I had not visited in twenty-five years; I wanted, suddenly, to swim in the lake which is its centerpiece. And so I went, but left after fifteen minutes, without swimming, though I sat on a towel in the grass staring at the lake. Something was missing. It took me those fifteen minutes to figure it out — the old concession shack was no more, it had been shut down. And though I loved the sound of splashing water and airborne shouts, what I loved most [End Page 206] was the sound of the little bell that rang every time a kid went into or came out of the concession shack, opening or closing its screen door. Kids in wet suits who went in to buy Creamsicles and came out licking them as the orange and white goo dripped. The bell! The bell! I missed the constant sound of that dinky bell, and my heart was broken. The sound of that bell was gone forever. You see, I am not really interested in tone; I am interested in bells. Here’s something intriguing: when I asked poets under the age of fifty what tone was (in a poem) they all said more or less it was the contextual inflection or attitude that helped determine meaning in a poem. When I asked poets over the age of fifty, they all said more or less that tone was a presence that was helplessly itself. I am not pitting these groups against each other, for both answers are relevant and meaningful, but being over fifty I do gravitate toward the helpless presence of a voice. At the same time, there are instances of the other I find riveting. On the day of the total eclipse of the sun in August 2017, a group of people in Oregon standing under the direct path of the solar event cheered and shouted during the minutes of totality. Cheered and shouted as if it were the stroke of midnight on New Year’s Eve. A group of people in Idaho, witnessing the same event, went dead silent in unison. I take these as two tones in response to the identical subject. The event was the subject, and the response was the tone. What would you have done? To which group do you belong? One older poet I asked about tone said, “Tone? My inner ear senses it, it’s just a feeling. There are a lot of writers I can’t read because I don’t yet have a sense of their tone. It’s not a criticism, it just means I don’t have the immediate affinity I have with someone like, say, Vallejo. And he’s one among a hundred.” [End Page 207] What is Vallejo’s tone, I asked, and he said, “I’ve never tried to put it into words. It’s in my ear. I used to say about Vallejo that I felt the poem was handed to me on a silver platter — it felt, sounded like a gift. With other writers, I sometimes feel like I am supposed to give them something. I know I’m not, but it can feel that way.” Does that have to do with the poet, or with you, I asked. “It’s a two-way street. An example for me is Borges. For some reason, I’m not there yet...