Abstract

Helicobacter canis, an enterohepatic Helicobacter, has proven its role in human diseases and has been rediscussed in recent years as its zoonotic potential is increasingly described. Routine microbiological detection of this pathogen is a difficult task as its culture may fail due to fastidious growth. It is therefore supposed that many clinical laboratories under-recognize H. canis infections. A review of all clinical and microbiological literature currently available from previous relevant H. canis human clinical cases, mainly bacteremia, added with a clinical case observed at the Cliniques universitaires Saint-Luc, was performed. Clinical features of H. canis reports show the presence of underlying clinical conditions in 89% of the cases, bacteremia in 83%, associated fever in 58%, and recent close contact with pets in 83%, especially dogs. The observed microbiological trends from 10 cases of bacteremia were a median of 4 days until positive blood culture bottle detection, subcultures showing a thin layer of small colonies under microaerophilic atmosphere at 35–42°C after 3–4 days of growth, and an identification requiring 16S rRNA sequencing given the difficulties observed with MALDI-TOF MS. Low MICs were observed for penicillins, amoxicillin/clavulanic acid, carbapenems, and metronidazole in opposition to high MICs for ciprofloxacin. A frequent association of H. canis and bacteremia in immunocompromised patients with recurrent fever in contact with pets, especially dogs, was identified. Considering the fastidious growing capacities, final identification from blood cultures may not be expected before 7 days. Intravenous ceftriaxone, oral doxycycline, or metronidazole has been suggested as efficient therapeutic choices.

Highlights

  • Discovered by Stanley et al (1993) from the feces of dogs, Helicobacter canis has been rediscussed in recent years as its zoonotic potential is increasingly described

  • Discovered in 1993 from the feces of healthy or diarrheic dogs (Stanley et al, 1993), clinically reported the same year in a boy with gastroenteritis (Burnens et al, 1993), this enterohepatic pathogen has proven its involvement over the recent years in bacteremia in patients with and without co-morbidities

  • Clinical cases with H. canis are poorly described in the literature and prevalence is most likely underestimated

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Discovered by Stanley et al (1993) from the feces of dogs, Helicobacter canis has been rediscussed in recent years as its zoonotic potential is increasingly described. Swennes et al (2014) identified sheep as a potential reservoir, and Sabry et al (2016) reported an indisputable zoonotic transmission by comparing H. canis sequences from humans and sheep contacts. Microbiological and Clinical Features of Helicobacter canis Reports (Gerrard et al, 2001; Leemann et al, 2006; Prag et al, 2007; Alon et al, 2010; Abidi et al, 2013; van der Vusse et al, 2014; Shakir et al, 2017; Mihevc et al, 2021). Seven of them, including ours, concerned patients with underlying conditions (Gerrard et al, 2001; Alon et al, 2010; Abidi et al, 2013; van der Vusse et al, 2014; Shakir et al, 2017; Mihevc et al, 2021)

Objectives
Methods
Findings
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call