Abstract

Tropical montane forests provide an important natural laboratory to test ecological theory. While it is well-known that some aspects of forest structure change with altitude, little is known on the effects of altitude on above ground biomass (AGB), particularly with regard to changing height-diameter allometry. To address this we investigate (1) the effects of altitude on height-diameter allometry, (2) how different height-diameter allometric models affect above ground biomass estimates; and (3) how other forest structural, taxonomic and environmental attributes affect above ground biomass using 30 permanent sample plots (1-ha; all trees ≥ 10 cm diameter measured) established between 1250 and 2600 m asl in Kahuzi Biega National Park in eastern Democratic Republic of Congo. Forest structure and species composition differed with increasing altitude, with four forest types identified. Different height-diameter allometric models performed better with the different forest types, as trees got smaller with increasing altitude. Above ground biomass ranged from 168 to 290 Mg ha-1, but there were no significant differences in AGB between forests types, as tree size decreased but stem density increased with increasing altitude. Forest structure had greater effects on above ground biomass than forest diversity. Soil attributes (K and acidity, pH) also significantly affected above ground biomass. Results show how forest structural, taxonomic and environmental attributes affect above ground biomass in African tropical montane forests. They particularly highlight that the use of regional height-diameter models introduces significant biases in above ground biomass estimates, and that different height-diameter models might be preferred for different forest types, and these should be considered in future studies.

Highlights

  • Tropical forests play a major role in the global carbon balance [1,2,3,4]

  • This study focused on the montane forests of Kahuzi Biega National Park (NP) and its surroundings (Fig 1)

  • Our results show that different height-diameter allometric models should be used depending upon forest types in montane areas—continent or regional models being potentially biased

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Tropical forests play a major role in the global carbon balance [1,2,3,4]. With increasing interest in REDD+, an important challenge facing ecologists and foresters is to quantify as precisely as possible the carbon stocks and their fluxes at different spatial scales [5]. Local forest biomass estimations based on field measurements commonly represent the foundation for the calibration and validation of remote sensing models [8,9,10,11]. Uncertainties and errors in local biomass estimations may propagate dramatically to broad-scale forest carbon stock assessment [12,13,14]. In the first case trees are harvested, weighted and dried and weighted again; while in the second case allometric equations are used to estimate biomass from a number of variables, mostly tree diameter, wood density, and sometimes, tree height [16]. In most cases, tree heights are measured for a number of individuals, and a height-diameter model is applied to estimate the height for the remaining trees [17,22]. Several authors have shown the significant biases in biomass estimates associated with using regional height-diameter models [19,23,24,25,26] and highlighted the need for local site specific height-diameter models

Objectives
Methods
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call