Abstract
This paper compares Benigno S. Aquino’s (Pinoy) and Rodrigo R. Duterte’s (Duterte) person deixis and argues that their use of such linguistic device in their first State of the Nation Adressesses was deliberate to communicate hegemony of inclusion. Triangulation of quantitative and qualitative methods was observed to analyze the person deictic markers in the speeches. The quantitative part involves counting the number of occurrences of the lexical names and person deixis used; whereas, the qualitative method involves analysis of the nominals and pronominals used within the Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) frameworks of Fairclough (1989, 1992, 1995, 2003) with Halliday’s (1978) Systemic Functional Linguistics, and the general framework of pragmatics for person deixis as explained by Huang (2007). Data showed that Duterte’s choices of deictic names for the Filipino people convey the solidarity of his government and his alignment with both his constituents and the marginalized Filipinos. Duterte’s first State of Nation Address (SONA) may be described by the marked use of I inclusive we, and you; whereas, Pinoy’s may be described by the marked use of inclusive we. Duterte used the third person the least times; while, Pinoy used the second person the least. Analysis revealed that the two presidents’ person deictic markers position themselves with the Filipinos and convey their good intents as well as the goodness of their administrations, their sharing of responsibilities even with the commoners, and their building of hegemony of inclusion while communicating power, despite the difference in the frequency and choices of pronouns. Duterte appeared to be more consistent in his lexical choices and use of pronominals. Keywords: Critical discourse analysis, person deixis, hegemony, critical thinking
Highlights
The Philippines has been under the care of presidents from 1899 to the present, the latest of whom are two opposing political figures who were brought to the highest seat of power by an overwhelming number of Filipino people
Duterte’s speech is a typical Philippine President’s speech, i.e. linguistically and substantially tailored in formal English for grand gathering of VIP’s and highly educated officials and guests; it is simplified and adjusted to the masses on the spot through his impromptu adlib in the mixture of English and Tagalog which is understood by the laymen
Pnoy’s is formal straight Tagalog which is mixed with English social and political jargons whenever better understood in English
Summary
The Philippines has been under the care of presidents from 1899 to the present, the latest of whom are two opposing political figures who were brought to the highest seat of power by an overwhelming number of Filipino people. The SONA is an avenue for Philippine Presidents to speak about national policies and issues and to establish the hegemony of inclusion to gain public support. The SONA is a power resource (van Dijk, 1998); the president has control over the speech and has great opportunities to influence and convince his listeners of his good intentions through his language
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
