Abstract

The article introduces the concept of hegemony to leadership theory, which has developed mainly as a critique of hegemonic stability theory. We argue that it makes sense to combine the two theories by introducing the concept of 'size' into neoliberal thinking about International Political Economy. We accept the neo-institutional hypothesis that a hegemon is not needed to provide public goods, and demonstrate with non-cooperative games how multiple leaders may jointly provide public goods. A game-theoretic model is developed illustrating with Nash equilibria the conditions under which a hegemon rationally switches from hegemony to leadership. It also shows why followers rationally switch from free-riding in their consumption of the public goods to taking part in leading, in the sense of contributing to covering the cost of the production of the public goods. The emergence of joint leadership leads to multiple equilibria in the sense of allowing for multiple stable leadership constellations. The actors are in a mixed-motive or coordination game where they have different preferences for the equilibria, and thus different preferences for which strategies to choose, and for who is to take part in covering the cost of the production of the public goods. Two aspects of joint leadership 'after hegemony' are treated, namely coercive and benevolent leadership on the one hand, and collective action in the sense of joint leadership on the other hand. Finally, future leadership constellations and the quest for international order are discussed.

Highlights

  • Der Artikcl fiihrt das Konzcpt dcr Hegemonic in die Lcadcrship-Thcoric cin, die urspri.inglich als Kritik an dcr Thcoric hcgcmonialcr Stabilitat cntstand

  • Draw ing on the theory of public good

  • Critics suggest that collective action on the part of small groups in the international system may be possible (Snidal 1985a; Gowa 1989; 307) and argue that the provision of openness and stability in the world political economy implies the supply of cxcludablc rath er than public goods (Conybcarc 1984)

Read more

Summary

Japan leads

World War.the formerhas bccri cha;cn. in preference to tl1cEC i2.landJapan. Since [H.F.Fj constitutesa Nash equilibrium.it is costly fortl1cVS to choosetl1clcatlcrship optionunless it coercestl1cEC to switch fiom followingtolcadingsimnltoococL~ly. ·n1crcfore.a d.ccliningrelativcad~'ll1lu1mgcay lead to a political stmgglcbetweentl1c hcgcmonimdtl1csecondnmkingpowers c~-cnbeforethe hegemonicperiod comesto a lie.finiteend. This situation corresponds to a coordination game between the US and the EC. A time gap between he gemonic and collective leadership systems should be expected since there is a conflict between the former hegemon and the former follow er over the condition s and the distribution of costs between major actors in a jointlcadcrs hip system It is at this point cruc ial that countries learn that structura l conditions have changed and that thorough analysis is required. F 0 0 0 0 -2.1 0 F 0 0 -2.1 4.0 0.2 -1.8 us L . 2.1 0 0 0.7 0.2 1.5 L 0.7 3.5 -1.8 1.0 0.5 ·1 .5

Ja pan leads
Followe r us
Follower us
Japan foll ows
FFF FHF
FHF FFH
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call