Abstract

ABSTRACTThis essay addresses the question of what poetry is made from by examining a number of cruxes in Hegel’s Aesthetics (other aspects of Hegel’s work, including the Early Theological Writings, the Phenomenology, and the Encyclopedia are also discussed). The essay takes its lead from recent attempts to recover the significance of Hegel’s aesthetics for thinking about modern and contemporary art (J.M. Bernstein’s Against Voluptuous Bodies and Robert Pippin’s After the Beautiful, above all), but notes that Hegel’s consideration of the materiality of poetry is especially intractable, given that poetic material, language, is not as straightforwardly material as canvas, paint, stone, and wood may be taken to be. The essay shows that both recent interpreters of Hegel’s aesthetics and commentators on his theory of poetry in particular have somewhat stinted the complexity of his view of poetry’s materials. The relation of poetry to art – indeed, whether poetry is and remains an art form – is, moreover, central to the essay’s discussion.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.