Abstract

Rising temperatures threaten the resilience of public transit systems. We determined whether bus stop shelters and tree canopy surrounding bus stops moderated the effect of warm season temperatures on ridership in Austin, Texas, and whether shelters and trees were equitably distributed. For bus stops (n = 2271) of Capital Metropolitan Transportation Authority, boardings per bus were measured 1 April–30 September 2019. Air temperature data originated from the Camp Mabry weather station. Tree canopy was calculated by classification of high-resolution aerial imagery from the National Agriculture Imagery Program. Data on race, ethnicity, poverty level, median age, and bus commuters within census tracts of bus stops originated from the 2014–2018 American Community Survey. Using multilevel negative binomial regression models, we found that shelters did not moderate the effect of high temperatures on ridership (p > 0.05). During high temperatures, each one-percent increase in tree canopy was associated with a lesser decrease (1.6%) in ridership compared to if there were no trees (1.7%) (p < 0.001). In general, shelters and trees were equitably distributed. Insignificant or modest effects of shelters and trees on ridership during high temperatures may be attributed to the transit dependency of riders. For climate change adaptation, we recommend tree planting at bus stops to protect from ridership losses and unhealthy exposure to extreme heat.

Highlights

  • Public transit has been established as superior to the automobile for its environmental and health benefits [1]

  • We found that temperatures exhibited a significant negative association with bus ridership, and tree canopy slightly moderated the effect of high temperatures on ridership

  • In assessing whether shelters and tree canopy surrounding bus stops impacted the effect of temperatures on boardings per bus, we described the five-model set for weekdays (Table 2), since we found near identical results as the model set for weekends (Table A1 in Appendix A)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Public transit has been established as superior to the automobile for its environmental and health benefits [1]. The per-mile crash rate of public transit is more than ten times lower than that of automobiles, and transit ridership has been found to be negatively associated with traffic fatalities [5]. Researchers have found public transportation and driving alone to exhibit negative and positive associations with mental health issues (p < 0.01), respectively [6]. Shifting from automobile use to public transit is an opportunity for more physical activity: researchers have determined transit users to be 7.3 (95% CI: 2.6–20.1) times more likely to reach recommended levels of physical activity than non-transit users [7]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call