Abstract

When plant species compete for pollinators, climate warming may cause directional change in flowering overlap, thereby shifting the strength of pollinator‐mediated plant–plant interactions. Such shifts are likely accentuated in the rapidly warming Arctic. Targeting a plant community in Northeast Greenland, we asked (a) whether the relative phenology of plants is shifting with spatial variation in temperature, (b) whether local plants compete for pollination, and (c) whether shifts in climatic conditions are likely to affect this competition. We first searched for climatic imprints on relative species phenology along an elevational gradient. We then tested for signs of competition with increasing flower densities: reduced pollinator visits, reduced representation of plant species in pollen loads, and reduced seed production. Finally, we evaluated how climate change may affect this competition. Compared to a dominant species, Dryas integrifolia × octopetala, the relative timing of other species shifted along the environmental gradient, with Silene acaulis and Papaver radicatum flowering earlier toward higher elevation. This shift resulted in larger niche overlap, allowing for an increased potential for competition for pollination. Meanwhile, Dryas emerged as a superior competitor by attracting 97.2% of flower visits. Higher Dryas density resulted in reduced insect visits and less pollen of S. acaulis being carried by pollinators, causing reduced seed set by S. acaulis. Our results show that current variation in climate shifts the timing and flowering overlap between dominant and less‐competitive plant species. With climate warming, such shifts in phenology within trophic levels may ultimately affect interactions between them, changing the strength of competition among plants.

Highlights

  • Flowering plants and their pollinators form complex networks of interactions (Bascompte & Jordano, 2007; Jordano, 1987)

  • Targeting a plant community in Northeast Greenland, we asked (a) whether the relative phenology of plants is shifting with spatial variation in temperature, (b) whether local plants compete for pollination, and (c) whether shifts in climatic conditions are likely to affect this competition

  • If different plants rely on different environmental cues to initiate flowering, progressing climate change may cause the timing of interacting individual species to slide toward more or less overlap (CaraDonna et al, 2014; Schmidt et al, 2016)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Flowering plants and their pollinators form complex networks of interactions (Bascompte & Jordano, 2007; Jordano, 1987) While such networks are typically framed in terms of mutualistic interactions between the two trophic levels, within-guild interactions offer an important added dimension (Blüthgen & Klein, 2011; Carvalheiro et al, 2014). Most of these within-guild interactions have been. As a consequence, Mosquin (1971) hypothesized that species have evolved differing flowering times to increase their fitness by reducing interspecific competition for pollinators. Neutral and facilitative effects have been observed (Gilpin, Denham, & Ayre, 2019; Holzschuh, Dormann, Tscharntke, & Steffan-Dewenter, 2011; Lázaro, Lundgren, & Totland, 2009)

Methods
Findings
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call