Abstract

Objective: Movement efficiency can be quantified during physical tasks by measuring the rate of change of acceleration (jerk). Jerk captures the smoothness of a motion and has been used to quantify movement for upper extremity and torso-based tasks. We collected triaxial accelerometer data during four physical tasks commonly performed in the work place to determine if jerk increases with physiologic strain.Methods: Participants completed a circuit of activities that mimicked the demands of manual labor in hot (40°C) and temperate (18°C) conditions. The circuit included walking on a treadmill carrying a load on the shoulder, lifting objects from the floor to the table, using a dead blow to strike the end of a heavy steel beam, and a kneeling rope pull. After the 9 min circuit, the participant had a standing rest for 1 min before repeating the circuit 3 additional times. Participants were instrumented with four 3-axis accelerometers (Actigraph wGT3X) secured to the torso, wrist, and upper arm.Results: There were 20 trials in the hot condition and 12 trials in the temperate condition. Heart rate and core body temperature increased during both protocols (p < 0.001). Measures of jerk varied by accelerometer location and activity. During treadmill walking, the wrist, torso, arm accelerometers measured higher jerk during the fourth circuit in the hot condition. During the lifting task, mean jerk increased in the hot condition in all accelerometers. Max jerk increased in the temperate condition in the arm accelerometer and jerk cost increased in the hot condition in the torso and arm accelerometers.Conclusions: Forty minutes of paced work performed in the heat resulted in increased acceleration and jerk in accelerometers placed on the torso, arm, and wrist. The accelerometers most consistently reporting these changes were task specific and suggest that a limited number of worn sensors could identify the onset of fatigue and increased injury risk.

Highlights

  • Public safety, occupational, and military agencies are interested in real-time physiologic monitoring of vital signs, such as heart rate and core temperature (Coca et al, 2010; Friedl, 2018; Morrissey et al, 2021)

  • Core temperature was higher in the hot temperature at the end of the third and fourth circuits while mean skin temperature was higher in the hot condition at the end of every circuit (Figures 2B,C)

  • We did not place an accelerometer on the lower extremity, similar findings were reported in a previous study of subjects performing simulated occupational tasks while wearing an accelerometer on the ankle (Baghdadi et al, 2018)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Occupational, and military agencies are interested in real-time physiologic monitoring of vital signs, such as heart rate and core temperature (Coca et al, 2010; Friedl, 2018; Morrissey et al, 2021). Using Accelerometers to Identify Fatigue to understand the normal responses of each individual wearing the monitor. Younger individuals can safely tolerate higher heart rates during exertion compared to older individuals. Even within a given age group, fit individuals would tolerate higher heart rates than unfit individuals and work at lower heart rates at any given submaximal intensity. It is nearly impossible to define a single algorithm based on heart rate that triggers a reliable advisory or alarm alerting the end user of excessive physiologic load and increased risk of injury during exertion

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call