Abstract

Modelling of wire-arc additive manufacturing process is an effective way for adapting the optimum parameters as well as understanding and managing the sequences of layer-by-layer deposition. Some of these parameters such as toolpath, deposition intervals and heat source power play important roles in improving the process viability and cost efficiency. In this article, we have studied Al-5Mg, Al-3Si alloys as demonstrators, from both experimental and modelling perspectives, to benchmark different deposition parameters and provided guidelines for optimising the process conditions. Physical values such as total distortion and residual stress were selected as indicators for the manufacturability of the structure. The simulations were performed by Simufact Welding software, that is outfitted with the MARC solver and the experiments were executed in a robotic cell. We have introduced a method for optimising the process parameters based on the heat source power modification and selection of unique parameters for each deposition layer. This was performed by monitoring the evolution of the molten pool size and geometry when building a wall structure. The results suggest that achieving an uninterrupted deposition process entails modification of the heat input for each layer. Thus, a simple analytical method was proposed to estimate the heat input reduction coefficient for a wall structure as a function of molten pool geometry and the height at which, a new layer is being deposited. It was also shown that a generic selection of parameters for aluminium alloys may impair the eventual quality for some of the alloys due to their inherent physical properties such as high temperature flowability.

Highlights

  • Additive manufacturing (AM) is rapidly turning into one of the major processing mainstreams for metallic components [1]

  • The performed modelling suggests that processing of Al alloys with short intervals and with adaptive heat source modification for each layer are the most effective way to limit the metrological deviations

  • The choice of deposition direction will strongly depend on the material flow properties

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Additive manufacturing (AM) is rapidly turning into one of the major processing mainstreams for metallic components [1]. Pickin and Young [9] compared the conventional joining methods such as gas metal arc welding GMAW and P-GMAW (pulsed variant) with CMT on Al-alloys and concluded that the deposition efficiency and control of penetration (dilution) is superior in the CMT method. The depth of penetration can be so low that the method is preferred in low-dilution cladding [10]. It was reported for Al, that alternating processes such as CMT and P-GMAW efficiently remove the tenacious surface oxide and bring a more mechanically robust deposition about [11,12,13]. Several researchers used CMT as a method of choice for several different materials such as Ti-6Al-4V [14], Al alloys [15,16,17,18,19], AZ31 Mg alloy [20] and steels [21,22,23]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call