Abstract
New heat‐flow data have been obtained in western Victoria at Horsham (89.8 ± 7.3 mW m‐2) and Warracknabeal (97.0 ± 8.7 mW m‐2). The results are significantly less than previous values obtained at Stawell and Castlemaine and consequently crustal models based on rapid cooling of high‐level melt emplacements require revision. More general models based on mid‐crustal detachments or underplating mechanisms do not require the preservation of a specific spatial anomaly and consequently remain unaffected. Previous inconsistencies between surface heat flow and surface heat production are eliminated if the new data are substituted for the previous Stawell and Castlemaine data.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
