Abstract

The borehole heat exchanger (BHE) is an efficient and economic tool for extracting geothermal energy within ground source heat pumps (GSHPs). The layout and cross-section tube configuration of the BHE is one of the crucial bottlenecks that strongly influenced the effectiveness of the BHEs, which recently attracted numerous attention.Hence, the interest in retrofitting cost-efficient configurations of BHEs is recently regarded as an improvement pathfor maximizing geothermal energy production. In this study, novel geothermal borehole heat exchangers with elliptic and oval double U-tube (2U) configurations are investigated and compared to a traditional circular 2U BHE.This paper explains the development of traditional circular 2U-tube BHEs that makes an optimally designed model for maximizing the heat extraction rates and minimizing the energy consumption characteristics and BHE number. A 3-D numerical model was developed and validated by relevant field experiments (Tianjin geothermal project). The numerical study was performed on four cases corresponding to different widths of elliptic and oval 2U BHEs configurations. Furthermore, a sensitivity analysis was performed to parametrically investigate the impacts of key design and operational parameters on heat extraction performance. Additionally, a 3-D numerical model coupled with a finite line heat source model was also developed to perform case studies for energy consumption analysis for two goals of optimization. The results show that the oval 2U BHE (type II) outperformed the other investigated 2U BHE configurations, which increased the maximal and mean heat transfer rate by up to 54.0% and 12.30%, respectively, compared to circular 2U BHE. While the elliptic 2U-tube BHE (type II) was minimal pressure drop and energy consumption rates, which showed a pressure drop of 36.20% lower than the circular 2U BHE. In the case study findings, the utilization of elliptic 2U-tube BHE (type II) can not only reduce the BHE number by 6.70% but also minimize the energy consumption of the water pump and the entire system by 36.9% and 8.2%, compared to that of traditional circular 2U-tube BHE, respectively.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call