Abstract

Heart transplantation (HT) in patients with failing univentricular circulation is often challenging. This is compounded by the ever-increasing number of patients with prior Norwood-type reconstruction of the aorta, large aortic root, and often dense adhesions from multiple prior operations. We aimed to elucidate differences in outcomes of HT in patients with prior univentricular palliations, with and without prior Norwood-type aortic arch reconstruction (ArchRec). All patients who underwent HT for failed univentricular palliation during the 1990-2022 period were included in the study. Of 45 patients, 18 had undergone ArchRec. Hospital mortality improved in the recent era (17.4% before 2006 vs 0% after 2006; p=0.11), despite a higher proportion of patients with ArchRec (17.4% before 2006 vs 60.8% after 2006, p=0.002). Patients with ArchRec had a higher number of prior cardiac surgeries (4.1±1.5 vs 3.2±1.3, p=0.04), longer cardiopulmonary bypass time (320±23 vs 242±21 min, p=0.02), more concomitant arch reconstruction (33.3% vs 0%, p=0.02), greater need for post-HT extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (33.3% vs 3.7%; p=0.01) and longer hospital stay (37.1±30.5 days vs 23.6±11.8 days, p=0.04). Freedom from death or retransplantation for all patients was 91%, 73%, 67%, and 53% at 1, 5, 10, and 15-years, respectively. Prior ArchRec, Fontan procedure, and earlier eras were not risk factors for death. The outcomes of HT after univentricular palliation have improved in recent times and low operative mortality can be achieved. Despite increased complexity, good similar outcomes can be achieved in patients with and without prior arch reconstruction regardless of the palliation stage.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.